Influence of Ground Motion Duration on the Peak Drift Demands of Reinforced Concrete Buildings
Abstract
Full Text:
PDFReferences
J. J. Bommer, A. Martınez-Pereira. The effective duration of earthquake strong motion, J Earthquake Eng. 1999; 3(2): 127–72p.
J. W. V. Lindt, G. H. Goh. Effect of earthquake duration on structural reliability, Eng Struct.2004; 26: 1585–97p.
J. Hancock. The Influence of duration and the selection and scaling of accelerograms in engineering design and assessment, PhD Thesis. Imperial College, London, UK. 2006.
N. Nanos, A. Elaens, P. Ponterosso. Correlation of the different strong motion duration parameters and damage indicaters of reinforced concrete structures, Proc 14th World Conf Earthquake Eng. China, 2008.
L. Lin, N. Naumoshi, M. Saatcioglu, S. Foo. Effect of strong-motion duration on the response of the reinforced concrete frame buildings, In: Proc 9th U.S. Nat 10th Canadian Conf Earthquake Engg. Paper No. 810.2010.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology. Earthquake model, HAZUS-MH MR1 technical manual, Washington, D.C. 2003.
International Code Council (ICC). International Building Code. Country Club Hills, Illinois. 2009.
American Concrete Institute (ACI). Building code requirements for structural concrete, ACI 318-08, ACI, Detroit, 2008.
SeismoSignal V.4.3 - A computer program for signal processing of strong-motion data, http://www.seismosoft.com. 2012.
A. Arias. A Measure of Earthquake Intensity. In Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants. R.J. Hansen (ed.), Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. 1970: 438-489p.
B.A. Bolt. Duration of strong ground motions, Proc Fifth World Conf Earthquake Eng. 1973; 1: 1304-1313p.
K. Kawashima, K. Aizawa. Bracketed and normalized durations of earthquake ground acceleration, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn. 1989; 18(7): 1041–51p.
PEER. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center: PEER Ground Motion Database (Beta), http://peer.berkeley.edu/peer_ground_motion_database. 2012.
COSMOS. COSMOS Virtual Data Centre, The Consortium of Organizations for Strong-Motion Observation Systems, 2012.
J. Hancock, J.J. Bommer, P.J. Stafford. Numbers of scaled and matched accelerograms required for inelastic dynamic analyses, Earthquake Eng Struct Dynmics. 2008; 37(14): 1585–607p.
J. Hancock, J. Watson-Lamprey, N.A. Abrahamson, J.J. Bommer, A. Markatis, E. McCoy, R. Mendis. An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using wavelets, J Earthquake Eng. 2006; 10(1): 67–89p.
J. Hancock, J.J. Bommer. Using spectral matched records to explore the influence of strong-motion duration on inelastic structural response, Soil Dynmics Earthquake Eng. 2007; 27: 291–9p.
D.R. Pant. Seismic pounding of a base-isolated building with adjacent structures, M Eng Thesis. Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan, 2010.
Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSEES). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, http://opensees.berkeley.edu/.2009.
D.C. Kent, R. Park. Flexural member with confined concrete, J Struct Div Proc Am Soc Civil Eng. 1971; 97(7): 1969–90p.
M. Menegotto, P. Pinto. Methods of analysis for cyclically loaded R/C frames, Proc Symp Resis Ultim Deform Struct Act Well Def Repeat Load. IABSE, Lisbon, Portugal, 1973.
T. Vesna. Modeling Diaphragms in 2D Models with Linear and Nonlinear Elements. UC Berkeley, http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/. 2011.
S. Elnashai, L.D. Sarno. Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering. United Kingdom: John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 2008.
ASCE. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. ASCE/SEI 7-05, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2005.
J. B. Mander, J. N. Priestley, R. Park.Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Engg. ASCE, 1988;114: 1804-1826p.
M. D. Trifunac, A.G. Brady. A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bulletin Seismolog Soc Am. 1975; 65(3): 581–626p.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37628/jsea.v3i2.242
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.