Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Influence of GGBFS on the Mechanical Properties of the Water Cured Fly Ash Aggregate-Based Geopolymer Concrete

Venkata Suresh Gudipudi, J Karthikeyan

Abstract


Abstract
Conventional concrete consists of cement, sand as fine aggregate and gravel, limestone or granite in various sizes and shapes as coarse aggregate including with water. In the present work, the feasibility of using industrial inorganic polymeric residues wastes as a total (100%) replacement to the traditionally used normal conventional concrete materials is examined in the preparation of the geopolymer concrete (GPC). In this GPC, the cement is totally replaced by the fly ash (class F) with ground granular blast furnace slag (GGBFS), bottom ash is used in place of fine aggregate, water cured fly ash aggregates (WCA) were (prepared using the class C fly ash by adopting palletisation technique) used in place of coarse aggregate and the alkaline solution is used in place of water for polymerization purpose with binding material. A new design mix (volume batch) procedure was formulated for geopolymer concrete. The GPC mixes were cast with WCA at 0, 10, 20 and 30%replacement of fly ash (class F) by GGBFS at 8 molar ratios of NaOH solution. The concrete was cured at normal room/ambient temperature only to minimise the water in the water curing. The physical and mechanical properties of the GPC were studied. It was observed that the GPC mixes with WCA at 30% GGBFS with 8 Molar ratio of NaOH concentration attained maximum compressive strengths of 33.93 MPa cured at room temperature.

Keywords: bottom ash, fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag, palletisation, sodium hydroxide solution

Full Text:

PDF

References


Wasserman R., Bentur A. “Effect of lightweight fly ash aggregate microstructure on the strength of concretes”, Cement Concr Res. 1997; 27(4): 525–37p.

Verma C.L., Handa S.K., Jain S.K., et al. “Techno-commercial perspective study for sintered fly ash light-weight aggregates in India”, Constr Buil Mater. 1998; 12(6–7): 341–6p.

Hardjito D., Wallah S.E., Sumajouw D.M.J., et al. Faculty of Engineering and Computing, Curtin University of Technology Perth, Western Australia “Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete”, Aust J Struct Eng. 2005; 6(1).

Chang T.-P., Lin H.-C., Chang W.-T., et al. “Engineering properties of lightweight aggregate concrete assessed by stress wave propagation methods”, Cement Concr Composit. 2006; 28(1): 57–68p.

Jo B.-W., Kim C.-H., Tae G.-h., et al. “Characteristics of cement mortar with nano-SiO2 particles”, Constr Buil Mater. 2007; 21(6): 1351–55p.

Biernacki J.J., Vazrala A.K., et al. “Sintering of a class F fly ash”, J Fuel Technol. 2008; 87(6): 782–92p.

Mishra A., Choudhary D., Jain N., et al. “Effect of concentration of alkaline liquid and curing time on strength and water absorption of geopolymer concrete”, ARPN J Eng Appl Sci. 2008; 3(1).

Lloyd N.A., Rangan B.V. “Geopolymer Concrete: A review of Development and Opportunities”, 35th Conference on Our World in Concrete and Structures. 25–27 August, 2010, Singapore.

Anuradha R., Sreevidya V., Venkatasubramani R., et al. ‘modified guidelines for geopolymer concrete mix design using Indian standard’, 2011. Archieve of www.SID.ir

Gomathi P., Siva Kumar A. ‘Fly ash based lightweight aggregates incorporating clay binders’, Indian J Eng Mater Sci. 2014; 21: 227–32p.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37628/ijct.v1i2.43

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.